March 30, 2010

2-0 Means (Le) Toux Bad for Philly

I wasn't exactly right about the scoreline, but I would have been had Chewy finished his sitter in the first half. 2-0 is just alright with me, but 4-0 would have been even more just alright than Jesus. I'm not interested in a deep philosophical breakdown of the game, because Philly is awful and the conditions weren't ideal. But here are my thoughts:

  1. We may still struggle to score goals until Kufo arrives
  2. The defense still looks solid
  3. Zakuani may be ready to live up to the hype
  4. This team can get a lot better going forward
So we blew some opportunities. Happened last year, happened this year. At least we got enough to take three points. So I'm not going to sweat the poor finishing just yet. But it's on my radar.

The D - good performance. But they weren't really tested beyond the first 10 minutes of the game. Philly showed some decent ball control early, and it culminated in a shot on goal by Orozco, but Keller was well positioned and the shot was under enough pressure that it never really was very dangerous. After Sounders got the opening goal, they settled down and controlled the game. Even if they didn't have the ball, the D made sure that Philly's possession never amounted to opportunities on goal.

Zakuani tormented his defenders all night. And he found somebody with his crosses, which is progress for him. I still want to see him make the decision to run at defenders more quickly, so he takes advantage of the space behind them before other defenders move into supporting positions. But I also want a pair of soft leather knee-high boots. We can't have everything we want (I'll settle for a dark green cape, if anybody has one). At my most pessimistic, I can say that Zakuani's defender wasn't very good. But even in this mindset, I must admit that he took advantage of his man. Last year, even when playing against slower defenders, Zakuani often struggled to make an impact on the game. Not the case this time around.

SSFC looked good. This was a workmanlike performance in some pretty bad conditions. They got two goals, they got out with a clean sheet, and the only injuries were the result of Philly's strange knee-to-the-back fetish. They didn't look dominating, and that's fine. It's early in the season. The way SSFC played, there is plenty of room for growth. The passes and touches will get crisper and sharper, and fitness levels will improve. Ultimately, I think we're going to see Seattle be able to play creative attacking soccer this year that results in goals, not just clever interplay 40 yards from net.

5 comments:

  1. I am concerned that you want knee-high leather boots.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I’d like to see Zakuani learn how to play soccer, not just be a fast guy who puts his head down and runs at guys. We’re never going to be a team that can control possession so long as we have guys like him and what’s his nuts on the outside.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The key is that they are SOFT leather knee-high boots. They match my lute.

    As for Zakuani - you have a point. But this is MLS, not Europe. He can still be a very successful player in MLS just by running at and around people (just like Cobi Jones).

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hard to judge the team after one game, but easy to judge the fans. 36,000 is solid, tripling the season average of New York last year.

    ECS can NOT be allowed to have those ridiculous speakers piping out cheers. Its pathetic, embarassing, and unnecessary.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Nothing in this post mentions attendance or bad ideas of the ECS. I don't even know what you're talking about. If you're going to keep up this argument about moving teams, then you'll have to accept that MLS will be, at best, an eight team league. Let it go. There is no quick fix. Teams have to figure out, through trial and error, how to attract and keep fans. Simply moving a team is not enough.

    ReplyDelete